« The Flip Side: Hooking-Up in the Bizarro World | Main | Love Sick? »

Is Pornography to Blame For the High Divorce Rate?

Ever since the invention of pornography, politicians and the public alike have expressed concerns about the potential negative effects that porn has on those who view it. In particular, many people worry that exposure to porn is destructive to people’s romantic and sexual relationships. This concern was seemingly validated by a recent study reporting that Playboy magazine was the “cause” of up to 25% of all divorces that occurred in the United States in the 1960s and 70s.1 Could this really be the case? Is exposure to porn destroying our love lives?

Although pornography has certainly been implicated in the downfall of some relationships, it does not appear to have created the epidemic some have claimed. First, let’s examine that Playboy study. The scientists who conducted this research compared the sales rates of this adult magazine to the U.S. divorce rate between the years 1962 and 1979. They found a positive correlation, such that as Playboy sales went up, so did the number of divorces. Based upon this information, the authors made the claim that Playboy was the “cause” of somewhere between 10 and 25% of all divorces. In doing so, these researchers made a fundamental error: it is simply not possible to infer causation from correlational data. We cannot say that Playboy sales caused those divorces with any more certainty than we can say those divorces caused an increase in Playboy sales (and that would seem to be an equally plausible interpretation of the data—for example, when men get divorced, they may increase their porn consumption because they no longer have a regular sex partner). It’s also possible that there’s some unmeasured third variable that explains the association between Playboy sales and divorces (e.g., perhaps both increases are attributable to the “free love” and swingers’ movements that took place in the 60s and 70s). Thus, it is probably wise not make too much of this finding.

I am unaware of any other research suggesting that pornography causes divorce. But does that mean that porn and relationships are a good mix? Not necessarily. Pornography’s effect on a relationship depends upon how both of the couple members feel about porn. In general, men find porn more sexually arousing than women,2 and they also watch it more frequently. For example, one scientist who wanted to study men who had never seen pornography before could not find even one guy who was a porn virgin! In light of men’s greater affinity for pornography, it is probably not surprising that women are more likely than men to see porn as a potential relationship problem, and there are indeed many women who find their male partner’s porn watching highly distressing.3 At the same time, however, there are many women who have a positive attitude toward porn and there are some couples for whom watching pornography is a mutually enjoyable activity that actually increases rather than decreases intimacy.

In short, it seems unwise to make a blanket statement that pornography is either bad or good for relationships. For some couples, porn is indeed destructive (particularly in cases where one partner uses it compulsively), but for other couples, porn can be a positive, shared experience that benefits the relationship. If you have particularly strong feelings about pornography one way or the other, it’s probably best to discuss them with your partner up front in order to avoid future relationship conflict.

Interested in learning more about relationships? Click here for other topics on the Science Of Relationships. Like us on Facebook to get our articles delivered directly to your NewsFeed.

1Daines, R. M., & Shumway, T. (2011). Pornography and divorce.

2Kingston, D. A., Malamuth, N. M., Federoff, P., & Marshall, W. L. (2009). The importance of individual differences in pornography use: Theoretical perspectives and implications for treating sexual offenders. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 216-232.

3Bridges, A. J., Bergner, R. M., & Hesson-McInnis, M. (2003). Romantic partners’ use of pornography: Its significance for women. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 29, 1-14.

Dr. Justin Lehmiller - Science of Relationships articles | Website/CV
Dr. Lehmiller's research program focuses on how secrecy and stigmatization impact relationship quality and physical and psychological health. He also conducts research on commitment, sexuality, and safer-sex practices.

image source: joeydevilla.com Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (2)

Milton Diamond would add that pornography might also have benefits, including reduced sex crimes (though I'm not sure I totally buy that)...http://hawaii.edu/PCSS/biblio/articles/1961to1999/1999-effects-of-pornography.html
"The concern that countries allowing pornography and liberal anti-obscenity laws would show increased sex crime rates due to modeling or that children or adolescents in particular would be negatively vulnerable to and receptive to such models or that society would be otherwise adversely effected is not supported by evidence. It is certainly clear from the data reviewed, and the new data and analysis presented, that a massive increase in available pornography in Japan, the United States and elsewhere has been correlated with a dramatic decrease in sexual crimes and most so among youngsters as perpetrators or victims."

February 17, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterDavid P. Schmitt

I've read a fair amount of research suggesting the same thing (i.e., that pornography consumption is negatively related to sex crimes). Moreover, even if you restrict the analyses to violent pornography, studies have reported weak and inconsistent evidence regarding its link to sexual aggression (Ferguson & Hartley, 2009). I don't know if I completely buy the hypothesis that porn use is "cathartic" and thereby reduces sex crimes; however, I would argue that if we want to reduce sex crimes, we need to stop looking at porn as the culprit.

February 18, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterJustin J. Lehmiller
Editor Permission Required
Sorry, due to the amount of spam we receive, commenting has been disabled for visitors of this site. Please see our Facebook page for comments on recent articles posted.